Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here The following is a KSCO commentary. Here is Kay Zwerling: This is called ?Where did Obama’s money come from?, and it is about Obama’s troubling internet fund-raising. This was recorded and played recently, and because I mistakenly attributed it to Maureen Dowd, an extreme liberal and no friend of conservatives, several listeners were very angry, so it was taken off the air. However, the message is important, so let’s try again, only this time generically. It was published in some New York daily newspaper recently written by some unknown writer, and it starts this way: ?Certainly the most interesting and devastating phone call I have received during this election cycle came recently from one of Obama’s campaign internet geeks ? mentioning that the internet raised thus far for Obama over $200 million, supposedly in $10 or $15 increments. This would mean around 13 million contributions, all of which should have been reported to the government. But, there is something wrong with this picture. This internet fund-raising needs a serious in-depth investigation and audit ? because the internet providers were surprisingly able to trace large sums of money coming from governments like Saudi Arabia, Iran, other Middle Eastern countries, and some even from China. It became clear that this money was coming from sources other than American voters. If indeed all this is true, we must ask ourselves ?Is it right for foreign countries, especially those who dislike us, to have an investment in who becomes our next President?? This is very scary. While almost all American media is and has been Obama admirers, they almost totally ignore McCain. That is not fair. Is it fair for Oprah to publicly promote Obama and refuse to interview Sarah Palin until after the election? Back to my giving mistaken credit to hateful liberal Maureen Dowd. One can wonder, though, while most of us are politically partisan, there could be moments when we each are confronted with the realization that something about to happen could endanger this Country we love, and we suddenly put politics aside and we become concerned that our nation should not be put in danger especially from foreign sources. Then we close ranks. This could be called political generosity. And this could be one of those moments. And, that could be why that liberal newspaper blew the whistle. So I repeat ?Is it right for foreign governments to help dictate who is to become our next President, and do they prefer Obama because surely he will be easier to deal with?? If we are judged by the company we keep, many of us are uneasy about Obama, and we wonder about his true agenda. McCain, however, has proven that he loves this Country dearly and unconditionally. For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling. Copyright 2008

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here The following is a KSCO commentary. Here is Kay Zwerling: The title of this commentary is ?Where did Obama’s money come from, and Obama’s troubling internet fund-raising. It was published in the New York times on June 29 of this year, written by Maureen Dowd.If you read her columns, you know she is no friend of conservatives, and it’s more amazing that the New York Times, who is ultra liberal, allowed this to be written. Dowd starts her column this way ?Certainly the most interesting and potentially devastating phone call I have received during this election cycle came this week from one of Obama’s campaign internet geeks mentioning that the internet raised thus far for Obama over $200 million ? supposedly in $10 or $15 increments from American voters. That would mean, according to Dowd, around 13 million contributions. Something is wrong with this picture. This internet fund-raising needs a serious in depth investigation and audit, because these internet providers were able to trace large sums of money coming from governments like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and other Middle Eastern countries. Checking further, it was discovered large sums coming from China. It because clear that this money was coming from sources other than American voters. If indeed all this is true, we must ask ourselves ?Is it right for foreign countries to have an investment in who becomes our next President?? I think this is very scary. But about the New York Times and Dowd, both admirers of Obama, and in this instance blowing the whistle on his internet fund-raising, I have to say kudos to Dowd and the New York Times, for in this instance putting the Country first. Here’s what I think. While most of us are politically partisan most of the time, there are moments when we each are confronted by the realization that something about to happen could endanger this Country we love, and we suddenly put politics aside and be concerned that our Country should not be put in danger. We close ranks. And, this is one of those moments. So I repeat ?Is it right for foreign countries to have an investment in who becomes our next President, and do they prefer Obama because he will be easy for them to deal with?? Please pass this information to your friends. For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling. Copyright 2008

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here The following is a KSCO commentary. Here is Kay Zwerling: The sad current fact is that there no longer is a true media in this Country. The news that We the People are getting is no longer honest and balanced. It is a planned liberal machine now committed to making Barack Obama President. And, it furthers the motto of leftist extremists, which is ?The end always justifies the means, no matter what.The McCain campaign is barely covered, and then mostly to ridicule Sarah Palin. But the public unfairly is not getting the real truth. The deck is stacked. Obama never held an executive job in his life. As a member of the Illinois Senate, he voted Present, but not Yes or No over 100 times. As President, who must make clear, often fast decisions, Obama would be a dismal failure. He cannot make quick decisions. Please, listen to this urgent request by Tom Winter, President and Editor in Chief of Human Events, a credible conservative Washington, D.C., weekly. Dear Conservative Friends, They say the truth hurts ? in Obama’s case, it is devastating.Not surprisingly, the BIG media has kept the American public blind to the truth about Obama including: The fact that a corrupt Chicago machine politician ?made a U.S. Senator out of Barack Obama?.How Obama won his first election by having his lawyers knock all his opponents off the ballot on technicalities ? a great tool for shady lawyers ? and this guy really plays hardball. Obama’s support for a grotesque ?infanticide? law which was even too extreme for Nancy Pelosi. The Tony Rezko connection ?I have never done any favors for him?, says Obama, about convicted developer Tony Rezko. Oh, but yes he has Then, Obama’s connection to ACORN, the ultra liberal tough organization, which started many years ago with good intentions and which supposedly bullied banks recently to make subprime loans to unqualified people. And, Obama’s wife’s salary tripled the year he became Senator and started earmarking funds to her employer. Then, Obama has repeatedly steered legislation to payoff campaign donors. And, there is much much more about Obama which has been carefully hidden. Tom Winter and his Human Events weekly want to expose the many skeletons in Obama’s closet by sending specifically to young people, especially those on college campuses, the editorial supplement called ?The Truth About Obama, what every citizen needs to know. He focuses on college campuses because liberal educators fill their students with liberal beliefs only. And, 85% of professors hired for the University of California are liberals. We the People should be grateful to Tom Winter for his passion in trying to let the public and especially the young college students know the truth. Kudos to you Tom Winter. Because Human Events is struggling financially, if you want to help, or even just buy a copy of The Truth About Obama, call 1-888-467-4448, repeat, 1-888-467-4448. These are critical times in our Country. We must not allow these BIG MEDIA LYING SCOUNDRELS and liberal college professors to succeed in placing one of the most extreme liberal and most inexperienced candidates ever in the White House. Just like the swift vote exposure of John Kerry in 2004, The Truth About Obama, even at this late stage in the campaign, could stop his victory. For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling. Copyright 2008

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here The following is a KSCO commentary. Here is Kay Zwerling: With regard to the relationship with We the People and our national government ? we have become estranged. We the People dropped the ball because our government has slowly learned to dumb us down with distractions like little emergencies. Like pesticides and chemicals in our food and water sources, toxic spraying, flu shots and vaccines, fluoride in our drinking water. They do that so they can do whatever they want without our involvement or interference. You know the analogy of putting a live lobster in a pot of cold water on the stove, turn the heat up gradually, and by the time the lobster realizes it, he is being boiled to death, and it is too late. So, our scoundrel leaders, led by our President George Bush, who illegally kept our borders open these last eight years, was Hell bent to get our country involved in making us part of the new world government. He never bothered to consult us or let us know to decide whether all of us liked the idea of subordinating our country to giving up our own sovereignty to initially become part of the forthcoming three-way alliance with Canada and Mexico. The latter a corrupt, trouble-filled country, who leaches on us regularly, and sends their criminals and unsavory citizens to come here illegally. If we enter Mexico illegally, we may be put in jail. I must say at this juncture that the Mexicans that come to our country legally are some of the most wonderful people that I have ever met. Why in our right mind would we want that coalition as a pathway to the alliance with other countries all led by the miserable corrupt United Nations? Why would we want to be a party to such a coalition?Our leaders are betraying us, and somehow we must put a stop to this abomination Go to your computer and Google the North American Free Trade Agreement, and see what you think. Let’s hope it is not too late. A different pressing issue. Ten years ago my husband and I entrusted AIG with a large portion of our hard-earned money. AIG has betrayed us, and I am in danger of losing a large part of that money. Now those greedy skunks want We the People to bail them out for many billions, no questions asked, and with the same people still in charge, and the irony of it is my answer would be ?Hell no Not on those terms. For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling. Copyright 2008

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here The following is a KSCO commentary. Here is Kay Zwerling: Last week I spoke about the book ?The Audacity of Deceit? which is about Obama and his plans for change. Written by Bradley O'Leary, a leading respected conservative strategist and fund-raiser, who has taken election year tactics to a new and powerful level. This is really exciting, so please listen. O'Leary has developed an online tool to put into the hands of voters, who want to persuade friends and family to look deeper at the Obama values before voting for him. The test, which may be found at BarackObamaTest.com is a 39-question test where voters can compare their views to the true Obama positions that are seldom revealed by the mainstream media. And there is a good reason for that. For example, pro life voters unaware of the radical nature of Obama’s views can now learn how he would withhold medical care to babies who survive abortions and allow them to die in so-called ?comfort rooms?. Also, voters who have no knowledge of Obama’s economic vision can learn how his tax, trade, and spending agenda will destroy growth and opportunity and how his healthcare program will provide taxpayer subsidized healthcare for illegal aliens. O'Leary concludes ?The next President will determine the destiny of our Country. That President should be a person whose values are yours. Take the BarrackObamaTest.com and learn the truth before it is too late. I took the test and learned that my values differ from Obama by 98%. Abundant kudos to Bradley O'Leary for his wisdom in creating such a unique and authentic way to learn about the values of a prospective leader of the United States and indeed the world. For KSCO and KOMY, this is Kay Zwerling. Copyright 2008

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here Saturday 9-13-2008, 8:00 p.m. KSCO 1080 AM radio www.ksco.comThe following is a KSCO commentary. Here is Kay Zwerling: There is a new book out called ?The Audacity of Deceit? written by Brad O'Leary. It is about Barrack Obama and how he plans to implement his promise of change for the American people. O'Leary discusses some important changes Obama wishes to implement: He will raise taxes from the low rate of 28% under Ronald Reagan to a whopping economy destroying 60% under Herbert Hoover. Obama claims that only the rich who now pay the 40% of their income will pay the higher 60%. Because the rich and corporations supply most of the jobs, the country will probably spiral into a deep Depression. Obama will wage a trade war that would eliminate 10 million American jobs He will choke off America’s domestic energy resources and send gas and electricity prices through the roof. He will implement a childhood government program designed to transfer infant and child raising responsibility from parents to the federal government. That is socialism. He will establish a government agency to approve what types of medical procedures and operations senior citizens will be permitted to have. That is also socialism. O'Leary continues, he will increase the liberal base by allowing felons to vote. This is the same reason liberals like open borders. Did you know that, as a State Senator, Obama blocked emergency medical aide for babies who survive abortion? Instead, he would rather leave them in a room to die. Then, O'Leary says that he will hand out federal medical insurance to more than 12 million aliens. This is just a sample of many issues which Obama will address if he becomes President. You can buy this book through Amazon.com. Otherwise, you might visit www.AudacityofDeceit.com (capital A of Audacity, and capital D in Deceit, and it is all one word), and if you go to that website you can choose one chapter of the book to read online. Also, the author says that Obama will restore the inheritance tax, and also will implement a retirement tax. And, finally, there will be new taxes to pay for socialized medicine so that we can receive the same medical care as other third-world countries do. Now remember, these are not my words, these are the words of Brad O'Leary in his book which is called ?The Audacity of Deceit. If all this can possibly be true, do you really want a socialist to be your President? For KSCO and KOMY, this is Kay Zwerling. Copyright 2008

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here The following is a KSCO commentary. Here is Kay Zwerling: Politically speaking, the next ten weeks will be very interesting.To their credit, it is prudent for Obama and Biden to say that criticizing candidates? family is off limits. I am really happy about Sarah Palin for V.P. She is my kind of person ? clear thinking, direct, and fearless. She takes on anyone who she believes is wrong, especially in her own party. And about experience, she has infinitely more experience ? executive experience ? than Obama ever had. McCain, the maverick, sure threw the liberals a curve. So, now we learn that Sarah’s 17-year-old daughter is pregnant ? and will keep the baby, and that she and her boyfriend will get married. The liberal media chose to gleefully announce the pregnancy, but neglected to mention the forthcoming marriage. Years ago the liberals insisted that condoms should be readily available in high schools because we parents cannot change young peoples? behavior.I believe it is weak and idiotic to think that way. Isn?t it better to convince your own children to abstain from reckless irresponsible behavior instead of giving them encouragement with condoms? It is a credit to Sarah’s daughter to keep her baby rather than have an abortion. Since she and her boyfriend will marry, that should be the end of the gossip. About Roe vs. Wade, for many years I was pro choice, and believed that no one or law should rule my body. Then, I saw several years ago, on TV, and I mentioned this before, how it is routine in the third trimester for a physician who can legally shoot the baby in the head with a gun as it is coming out of the womb. Now, I am pro life. One must see that there is more than just a woman’s body involved. At the moment of conception, there is another body growing, and the woman hopefully should not dispose of it.It should be allowed to grow to completion, and then if the mother still does not want it, there are so many couples who would gladly want to adopt it. The only valid consideration for abortion is the mother’s health or if it was a rape. This is an emotional topic, but it is timely, and there are no easy answers that would please everyone. However, many women who opted for abortion are regretful and scarred for life. Sadly, I know a few. For KSCO and KOMY, this is Kay Zwerling. Copyright 2008

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here The following is a KSCO commentary. Here is Kay Zwerling: This little gem is called World History 101. I do not know where this came from, but it is funny, and worth a few belly laughs, so don?t anyone get mad. It’s only fun. For those of you who slept through World History 101, here is a condensed version: Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.The two most important events in all of history were:1. The invention of beer, and2. The invention of the wheel.The wheel was invented to get man to the beer, and the beer to the man.These facts formed the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:1. Liberals2. Conservatives.Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That’s how villages were formed.Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BBQ at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ and doing the sewing, fetching, and hairdressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girlie-men.Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy and group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide all the meat and beer that Conservatives provided.Over the years, Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish, but like their beef well done. Most liberal women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, and group therapists are liberals.Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and are big-game hunters, cowboys, firemen, lumberjacks, construction workers, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, golfers, and generally anyone who works productively. Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when Conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing. About the rest of us who are moderates, we can go one way or the other. Here ends today’s lesson in World History 101.For KSCO and KOMY, this is Kay Zwerling. Copyright 2008