<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Kay Commentary 2011-08-13</title>
		<description>Discuss Kay Commentary 2011-08-13</description>
		<link>http://ksco.com/kay's-commentary/26495-kay-commentary-2011-08-13</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:07:10 --700</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://ksco.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/26495/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Ted says:</title>
			<link>http://ksco.com/kay's-commentary/26495-kay-commentary-2011-08-13#comment-139</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fully disagree. Founders legacy is keep religion to yourself. As a strict constructionist I note that our beloved Constitution mentions religion TWICE! And in both cases the upshot is to keep it personal - no laws for or against and no religious test shall ever be required. Suppose you're sad that a judge ruled the National Day Prayer that Billy Graham wanted 1952 has finally be ruled Unconstitutiona l. Please read the Treaty of Tripoli. Your attitude is most typical with so called conservatives as your concerns over your and everyone else salivation, that you wish public policy bend toward your particular religious dogma. Radical Muslims wish and do same. Where does it stop. Your hero said turn the other cheek and you noted that ditty, but fail to understand & heed. Time to write a check to your favorite ACLU and FFRF.org]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:41:06 --700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://ksco.com/kay's-commentary/26495-kay-commentary-2011-08-13#comment-139</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
